A continuation fund is a new private fund created by a general partner to acquire one or more assets out of an older fund it manages, letting the GP keep holding a prized company past the original fund’s life while giving existing investors the choice to cash out or roll their stake forward.
In plain terms
A private equity fund is built to end — typically 10 to 13 years, after which every holding has to be sold and the proceeds returned. Sometimes a GP has a company in that fund still compounding nicely with years of growth left, and selling it on the fund’s deadline rather than its merits makes no sense. A continuation fund solves that: the GP forms a new vehicle, that vehicle buys the asset from the old fund at a negotiated price, and the GP keeps managing the same company — just inside a new wrapper with a fresh clock and often fresh capital.
How it works
The transaction is a type of GP-led secondary. The general partner selects one or more assets from an existing fund — usually its best performer, sometimes called a “trophy asset” — and arranges for a new fund, typically backed by specialist secondary buyers, to purchase it. Existing limited partners in the old fund are given two choices: sell their interest in that asset for cash at the negotiated price, or roll their proceeds into the continuation fund and keep their exposure under new terms, which usually include a reset carried-interest clock for the GP.
The structural tension is unavoidable: the GP is the seller (on behalf of the old fund’s LPs), the buyer’s partner (running the new vehicle), and the party who set the asset’s price, all at once. Market practice has converged on two safeguards regardless of regulation — an independent third-party fairness opinion on the price, and a vote by the old fund’s limited partner advisory committee — though neither is currently mandated by federal rule. The SEC’s 2023 Private Fund Adviser Rules would have made an independent fairness or valuation opinion a legal requirement for adviser-led secondaries, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated those rules in June 2024, leaving the safeguards as market convention rather than federal mandate.
The numbers
- GP-led secondary volume, full-year 2025: $115 billion, roughly 48% of the $240 billion global secondary market, per Jefferies’ Global Secondary Market Review.
- Regulatory status, as of 2026: no federal rule requires a fairness opinion on a GP-led continuation fund transaction, following the Fifth Circuit’s June 2024 vacatur of the SEC’s Private Fund Adviser Rules.
- Typical structure: single-asset continuation funds (one trophy company) and multi-asset continuation funds (several holdings bundled together) both exist; single-asset deals have grown as a share of GP-led volume as the format has matured.
What people get wrong
That rolling into a continuation fund is the “safe” or default choice because it keeps an LP invested alongside a manager they already trust. The decision resets the clock on carried interest and often the fee basis too, meaning the GP can effectively start earning a share of profits on the same asset’s future growth a second time. The harder-to-see issue is the one on the selling side: the price the old fund’s LPs receive for an asset they’re exiting was set in a negotiation where their own general partner was simultaneously the seller and the buyer’s business partner, which is precisely why the independent fairness opinion — now a market norm rather than a legal requirement — is the detail worth checking before assuming a quoted price was arrived at at arm’s length.
Related
Read more: Hedge Funds and Private Equity: The Other Engine of Modern Finance Wealth · Alternative Assets: Investing Beyond Stocks and Bonds
See also: Secondaries · DPI, TVPI, and IRR · Clawback